Abstract
This article offers reflections on selected problems of legal epistemology. It discusses the ways in which legal knowledge is constructed, interpreted, and justified, and it considers the relevance of different logical and methodological approaches to legal thought. The article contributes to a broader debate on the foundations of legal reasoning and the relationship between legal science, interpretation, and social reality.
Recommended Citation
Naciri, Khalid
(1985)
"Reflections on Problems of Legal Epistemology,"
Revue Marocaine de Droit, d'Economie et de Gestion (Moroccan Journal of Law, Economics and Management): Vol. 4:
Iss.
2, Article 11.
https://doi.org/10.66499/2665-7112.1406
Available at:
https://scholarhub.univh2c.ma/remadeg/vol4/iss2/11
DOI
10.66499/2665-7112.1406