•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The historical development of labor law has revealed the distinctive nature of the individual employment relationship, which differs from other individual contracts due to the structural imbalance between its parties and the worker's need for substantial protection. With the rise of social doctrines and theories of economic intervention, the legislator was required to intervene effectively to secure this protection and to address new forms of relationships and disputes unknown to classical private law, giving rise to new principles and institutions. Within this framework, the study examines the role of the chamber of deliberation (chambre du conseil) in social litigation, analyzing the tension between the explicit wording of the legal text and the actual practice of the courts. It questions how Moroccan judges reconcile statutory provisions with the practical realities of labor disputes, highlighting the gap that may emerge between legislative intent and judicial application.

DOI

10.66499/2665-7112.1662

Share

COinS