•  
  •  
 

Abstract

While the judiciary may legitimately be the subject of interpretive scholarly discussion—whether through the reasoning underlying its judgments or in the wider debate carried out in journals, seminars and academic gatherings—the organization by the Faculty of Legal, Economic and Social Sciences of Casablanca of a colloquium on "Social Law: Assessment and Prospects" set out to move beyond purely descriptive papers on existing legislation toward critical, multidisciplinary reflection on labor issues, aiming to contribute positively to the reform of labor law. The author, writing as a defender of the judiciary, reflects on this dual theme of assessment (bilan) and reform. He argues that disagreement over reform stems from ideological debate on how society should be organized and from the confrontation between liberal and opposing currents, and questions which reforms could help dispel the crisis of confidence that sometimes arises between litigants and the courts, a crisis partly rooted in a scattered and inconsistent body of law.

DOI

10.66499/2665-7112.1669

Share

COinS